Website Modules
Common Features
Get a FREE QUOTE
Content Management Systems
Shopping Cart Design
Contact Us Forms
Web Alerts
Data Encryption


Promotional Features
Get a FREE QUOTE
Banner Advertising
Article Marketing
Personalized eNewsletters
Discussion Forums
Site Map Design


Advanced Features
Get a FREE QUOTE
Real Estate Website Design
Business Applications
 Address Book
 Calender


Additional Services
Get a FREE QUOTE
SEO & PPC
Surveys in emails
Website Design
Custom Business Applications
Flash Design
Website Design and Marketing Articles  
SQL Server Anlysis and Training (SQL vs MySQL vs Orcle) (2/5/2004)

At this time we are no longer building websites. If you are a developer and are interested in purchasing the PromoteWare software and or this web site please contact us at 800-670-7996.

If you are looking to have a web site built please click here and you will receive 5 competitive website quotes.



SQL Server Analysis

As is the case with development languages, a developer’s familiarity generally determines preference.  And as is the case with development languages, cost and performance are the only quantifiable measurements.  MySQL is the cheapest database to purchase, however, it is intended only for small and medium sized applications.  In addition, it is commonly believed to be more difficult to maintain and less powerful than both SQL Server and Oracle. 

Since MySQL does not participate in the tests conducted by TPC (Transaction Processing Performance Council), an independent analysis firm that gauges the performance of databases, it cannot be compared to other systems such as SQL Server and Oracle.  While Oracle has consistently outperformed SQL Server, the licensing costs place it out of reach of small and medium sized businesses.  Oracle is intended for large-scale, enterprise applications and is generally not offered by web hosts.

 While both SQL Server and MySQL are viable options for small and medium sized websites, .Net comes with native support for SQL Server, making it easier to implement .Net solutions using SQL Server, while increasing performance due to the native interface.  SQL Server is also more widely used, and therefore, it is easier to find development support.

 Note: the costs of SQL Server do not effect the small company because the ISP spreads the cost over many users.

 

Feature

SQL Server 2000

Oracle 10g

MySQL

Independent Performance Benchmarks

2nd Place

1st Place

Does not participate – intended for small to medium sized systems

Independent Analysis of Price/Performance Ratio

1st Place – licensing is 25% the cost of Oracle

Unknown

Does not participate – commercial licenses are cheaper than SQL Server

Cross Platform Compatible

No

Yes

Yes

Fully Relational – affects data storage, retrieval and integrity

Yes

Yes

Somewhat – does not support foreign key constraints

Language

Transact-SQL – considered easy to use and more powerful than MySQL Dialect

PL/SQL – considered more powerful than Transact-SQL but more difficult to use

MySQL Dialect – difficult to use with limited power

Maintainability

Easy

Difficult

Difficult

Open Source

No

No

Yes

SQL Server References:

  1. http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3087841
  2. http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_perf_results.asp
  3. http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/2170201

 Email this Article to a friend...   Back to Articles